Skip to content
Eptura
Feedback by UserVoice

Eptura Asset

Eptura Asset


Welcome to the Eptura Asset Ideas forum. We love hearing your feedback. If you have suggestions for ways Eptura Asset can better meet your needs, please share them with us. While we may not be able to respond to every suggestion, our product team regularly reviews all submitted ideas.

Start contributing

  1. Search to see if your idea already exists and add your voice by commenting or voting.
  2. If you have an idea that’s not listed yet, submit a new entry.
  3. Select a category to tell us which area your idea addresses.
  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

201 results found

  1. This program needs to be able to create one single work order with multiple assets. Say there are 30 assets that need to be inspected on a daily basis. We need to be able to have one single daily inspection work order. Currently, if I attach our daily inspection to all 30 assets, I get 30 individual work orders pertaining to each individual asset which is absurdly redundant. Hippo software did not have this issue & needs to be reimplemented.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. This program needs to be able to create one single work order with multiple assets. Say there are 30 assets that need to be inspected on a daily basis. We need to be able to have one single daily inspection work order. Currently, if I attach our daily inspection to all 30 assets, I get 30 individual work orders pertaining to each individual asset which is absurdly redundant. Hippo software did not have this issue & needs to be reimplemented.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. A large enterprise client feels this feature should only be available in ADMIN settings. Currently, ADMINS can go to settings > tools and support > import tool. However, this feature is also available on each module, as well. One of their end users just added Parts in mass and created a mess.

    Of course, the ADMINS removed the ability to add or edit Inventory in Security Roles; however, they ONLY wanted to remove this ability in mass.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. Add options in Security Roles to allow access to the Audit Module without simultaneously allowing unnecessary access to configuration settings. Security Roles need further granularity.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Add a “Parts Request Form” with access to the Parts Master in order to select the correct Part(s).
    Work flow: Request part from Parts Master on Parts Request Form > Create WO with Part(s) automatically added to the WO > link PO > Create PO to order parts.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Enterprise clients may have hundreds of pages of Assets, Work Orders, Inventory, etc. Currently, clients can filter the columns, narrowing the scope. One Enterprise client had hundreds of pages of Inventory. Rather than selecting page after page, my primary contact requested the ability to select a specific page. Please add a "Go to page ____" option rather than having to select each individual page to advance. Thank you for the consideration.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. Right now when you are adjusting inventory quantity in the adjustment tab and press "Enter" it cancels whatever adjustment you made. It would be much more user friendly that when you press "Enter" after inputting all the required information that it instead completed the adjustment instead of cancelling it.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Having a column next to the Qty line would be beneficial to anyone making counts that is not familiar with what parts have a different Unit of Measurement. This would eliminate extra recounts or excess ordering coming from incorrect counting on parts having a different UOM than Each.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Being able to do a bulk transfer from warehouse to warehouse to track parts movement through our site via either a transfer import or mulitple select in the transfers module.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. Use Case: Enterprise client has 45 locations. End users are saving their Asset "saved views" as "Public"; therefore, this is creating a large list of saved views for all end users to sort through. Please add options in settings to limit the end users' ability to submit public saved views in each of the modules.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. An enterprise client wants the ability to view the part and/or asset data history in all sites, including inactive sites.
    Use Case: A part is recalled, and they need to view the part history, and to which assets the part is associated, including both active and inactive sites.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. Enterprise client requesting an additional API Endpoint for Service Tasks

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. Program should not allow multiple work orders to be generated for the same PM. On the PM Tab if you check the box next to the asset and then go to Actions drop down, you can select Generate Work countless times. This should not be possible. If it stays as it is now, could a warning be added to let the user now there is already an existing work order on this PM?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. Enterprise client wants to prevent their technicians from manually updating the WO completion date. As per their workflow, they have a "tech complete" active status, and then their supervisors update the status of the WO to completed. Technicians are manually updating the WO completion date, which is affecting when parts are being consumed.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. Creating cycle counts should have more options, such as transaction triggered (those parts used via work order in some time periodicity) and those with a total value in excess of some value (i.e. combined parts value exceeds $1500.00).

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. A customer recently reported a permissions breach in which a site administrator in their India division unintentionally modified a work order status flow that impacted their Canadian sites. The Canadian division relies on highly controlled configurations and cannot tolerate cross-site setting changes due to accuracy and operational risk.

    The intent was to grant the India-based site admin full control within their own site only; however, enabling the Site Admin role—allowed changes to propagate across sites. Per our internal review, the root cause was enabling the Site Admin toggle. This incident has resulted in the Canadian sites shutting down work order…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. It is critical to be able to count all spare parts in our store room. Not being able to count components has us counting them off line. We must do this to stay in compliance with our policies and procedures. Otherwise we must do a 100% inventory at year end. We need to be able to add components to cycle counts in order to count the entirety of inventory. This also throws off your KPI's because it is misrepresenting counting your inventory at 100%... Components are part of inventory!

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. It would be nice to be able to bulk apply the permission CAN BE ASSIGNED FOR WORK checkbox to multiple vendors over having to do it one by one.

    Use Case: If a customer has a large number of vendors in the system and they want that vendor to be searchable when applying them to work orders, the checkbox CAN BE ASSIGNED FOR WORK needs to be checked off in the vendor record details.

    It would be highly valuable to enable bulk updates for the “Can Be Assigned for Work” checkbox across multiple vendor records, rather than requiring manual updates…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?