Skip to content
Eptura
Feedback by UserVoice

Eptura Engage

Eptura Engage


Welcome to the Eptura Engage Ideas forum. We love hearing your feedback. If you have suggestions for ways Eptura Engage can better meet your needs, please share them with us. While we may not be able to respond to every suggestion, our product team regularly reviews all submitted ideas.

Start contributing

  1. Search to see if your idea already exists and add your voice by commenting or voting.
  2. If you have an idea that’s not listed yet, submit a new entry.
  3. Select a category to tell us which area your idea addresses.

Eptura Engage

Categories

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

1159 results found

  1. Business Problem: Customers increasingly operate mixed hardware ecosystems.

    Requested Enhancement:

    Ensure:

    • Full Neat compatibility
    • Strong Device Hub integration
    • Feature parity with native hardware

    Business Value

    Hardware flexibility
    Easier standardization
    Better customer adoption

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. Problem

    When a panel fails, admins must:

    Identify panel
    Gather logs
    Gather room information
    Navigate to Support portal
    Manually submit ticket

    This creates:

    30–60 minutes of overhead
    Potential days of back-and-forth

    Bain referenced Neat as an example of best practice.

    Neat allows:
    Ticket submission from panel
    Ticket submission from cloud portal
    Automatic device metadata inclusion

    Bain views this as a major usability differentiator.

    Requested enhancement:
    Add:

    “Report Issue / Open Support Case” option

    From:

    Panel admin screen
    Device Hub / Connect portal

    Automatically attach:

    Device ID
    Location
    Logs
    Firmware
    Authentication context

    Business Value:
    - Faster issue resolution
    - Reduced troubleshooting…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. Current behavior:
    If one admin enables notifications
    Every admin receives notification emails
    Creates inbox noise and limits usability

    This is especially problematic for Bain because:

    Multiple admin tiers exist
    Local
    Regional
    Global
    Some admins do not manage panels at all
    Bain uses follow-the-sun support

    Result: Feature becomes unusable, reduced proactive monitoring capability

    Enhancement request:
    Make notification subscriptions:

    Phase 1:

    User-specific
    Only the subscribing admin receives alerts

    Phase 2:

    Add optional filtering by:
    Building
    Region
    Device scope

    Business Value

    Improves proactive support
    Reduces alert fatigue
    Enables scalable global administration

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. Currently, Eptura Engage does not support limiting bookings per user within a calendar month.
    For our desk sharing setup, this is essential to ensure fair access to workspaces.
    The existing limit on active bookings is not sufficient, as users can still book many days across a month.
    We need a configurable group-level rule to cap booking days per month (e.g. 12 days).
    Once the limit is reached, no further bookings should be allowed in that month.
    An optional override for special roles or projects would be helpful.
    Visibility of remaining booking days for users would improve transparency.
    This feature would…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Desk Booking  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Mobile app - See who's in. This currently only shows who's in the office per your group.

    Would be great to show all staff who are in the office that day. As a safety protocol, we need to account for everyone in the office during emergencies. If we can access this on our phone, rather than pulling a report on the website, this can be useful during emergencies.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Mobile  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. We've love to have a single user journey when a user decides to come into the office that gives them the option to book a desk and parking space at the same time - perhaps integrated with a waitlist function. We have many users who can get a desk but not a parking space and vice versa.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Desk Booking  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. When a new booking is created in a scenario with an active Exchange integration and mailbox mapping for a room, Engage does currently not provide the option for Cisco Room Navigator devices to properly handle the check-in from the Cisco panels (via Exchange mailbox). Bookings that are not synchronized to ones personal calendar (add to my calendar checkbox) will result in a room as the only attendee for a meeting, where the check-in trigger via Exchange fails due to missing organizer of the meeting. The request is to support a service account ownership model where bookings are managed on behalf…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Our Product team is currently reviewing your idea. We may contact you if we need additional information or clarification. While not every idea will be added to our product roadmap, we carefully evaluate each submission and yours will receive full consideration.

  8. Some colleagues suggested they are not interested in seeing who is in the "My Team Overview" who have only booked a room, not a desk. Because many meetings take place remotely and this does not mean necessarily that the host who booked the room is attending themselves. A Filter for personal spaces or meetings spaces would help in this case.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Room Booking  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Eptura Engage Advanced Analytics - enhance output fields for Utilization&Trends - Booking Report
    where we are looking for 'NO SHOW' report that need to be enhanced with email address = primary key
    currently only name available for booked by/for
    thanks,
    Ann

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Reporting  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. Currently if you add a visitor to a meeting in Engage and do not specify an e-mail address, a duplicate profile is created in Visitor (Proxyclick). We will end up with hundreds of versions of the same visitor this way.

    Example here of choosing a visitor, and then their profile duplicating.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. Configure Engage for sending emails for bookings or cancellations made via API.

    The engineering team has confirmed that currently the booking confirmation emails are not triggered when the booking is created through the admin API.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. Feedback from customer:

    Language translation (German) not accurate. for example: "Booking Grid" > is translated into "Overview".

    Also the office/remote availabilty view does not reflect the availabililty properly when a fixed desk is released.

    They have tio adjust each manually.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Desk Booking  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. Have the ability to assign two leaders to the same office so they both show on the floor plan. Also, the ability to assign 4 maintenance teach to the one maintenance office. This will help provide true numbers of assigned onsite employees and visibility on the floor plan.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. Want to have multiple vendors assigned to one article, for example we have multiple vendors working in the same building who can all deliver pretzels or coffee at the same price. vendors will decide between themselves which one will fulfil the order based on their capacity.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. Summary in booking form is very Vague, can not support on a Admin Level

    Summary needs to be more Granular more detail.

    and eptura does not provide audit logs and refuse to show or provide

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. Our client prints all orders for kitchen operations (hygiene compliance requirements) and cannot determine which orders need reprinting, which will severely disrupt their operations

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. Problem: Location admins cannot override the capacity when they are booking a conference booking. It also gives more transparency to the vendors as they can give a certain name to a room combination.

    Feature request: Booking linked spaces with Exchange like you do without.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Room Booking  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. Problem: The Webinterface is not supporting hybrid meeting culture. So if you turn on the capacity search, you cannot override it and invite more attendees. Which is a no go.

    Feature Request: Searching for a room with a certain capacity while supporting hybrid meeting culture

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. We often have to update meetings with additional catering services that have been ordered whilst the meeting is still in progress. But this is not possible, they also getting an error message and have to wait until the meeting is over and have to inform the kitchen manually!

    Feature request: Ability to update ongoing bookings

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. That is also a big problem, as they cannot book linked spaces via Exchange and in the Conference Booking they cannot override the capacity, what they should be able to do.

    Request: Updating the capacity like a country/ global admin

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?