Skip to content
Eptura
Feedback by UserVoice

Eptura Asset

Eptura Asset


Welcome to the Eptura Asset Ideas forum. We love hearing your feedback. If you have suggestions for ways Eptura Asset can better meet your needs, please share them with us. While we may not be able to respond to every suggestion, our product team regularly reviews all submitted ideas.

Start contributing

  1. Search to see if your idea already exists and add your voice by commenting or voting.
  2. If you have an idea that’s not listed yet, submit a new entry.
  3. Select a category to tell us which area your idea addresses.

JUMP TO ANOTHER FORUM

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

63 results found

  1. API specific 'playground' or 'push/publish' function to verify API functionality/changes.

    Because the API has the ability to create data points, there should be safeguards, sandboxes, or playgrounds in place that allow for testing before feature publishing.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Thank you for your suggestion—this idea has merit and aligns with our broader strategy. However, due to other priorities, we are unable to pursue it at this time. We’ll keep it on our radar and revisit it when the timing is right or if we see increased interest from our customer community.

  2. The ManagerPlus API v2 currently supports GET and POST for /Assets, but returns HTTP 405 for PATCH/PUT methods. This prevents programmatic updates to existing asset records.

    Use Case:
    We need to bulk-update asset fields (descriptions, statuses, etc.) for our 2,400+ asset inventory without manual UI edits.

    Requested Feature:
    Enable PATCH or PUT on /api2/Assets/{assetKey} to allow updating existing assets via API.

    Expected Behavior:
    PATCH /api2/Assets/{assetKey}
    {
    "Description": "Updated value",
    "StatusId": "ACTIVE"
    }

    Would enable automated data quality workflows and reduce manual administrative overhead for maintaining accurate asset records.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. We need the ability to make API calls that retrieve or set any and all fields associated with asset records, including standard fields, custom fields, budget fields, hierarchy fields, and any other asset properties. Currently, the API documentation doesn't clearly expose all available fields or provide comprehensive endpoints for accessing the full asset schema. This would enable:

    -Bulk operations on all asset attributes programmatically

    -Complete asset records in API responses (not truncated/limited)

    -Field discovery without reverse-engineering existing assets

    -Integration with external systems that need to read(at least)/write all asset data (including status/state)

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Thank you for your suggestion—this idea has merit and aligns with our broader strategy. However, due to other priorities, we are unable to pursue it at this time. We’ll keep it on our radar and revisit it when the timing is right or if we see increased interest from our customer community.

  4. It would be nice to be able to have the ability in the mobil app to select several technicians to be able to add labor to a work order. Commonly, several technicians are working on the same work order, and it would be nice to have one person add each technician's labor on the work order. Right now, each tech has to open the work order and add their time individually.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. NEED TO BE ABLE TO SEND A REQUISTION OUT TO THE VENDOR THAT THEY CAN RETURN PRICING. (SIMILAR TO A WORK ORDER BEING SENT TO A VENDOR).

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. When completing the "Receiving" portion of the PO it would be helpful if the lines came up in numerical order. Currently, they are displayed in random order. My discussion with the support team indicates that this "Random" order is working as intended. This is cumbersome to my team when we are processing large receipts especially with backorder items.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Great news - your idea has been approved for inclusion in our product roadmap! Please note that the final feature set may evolve as we incorporate additional customer feedback, conduct product and design research, and consider broader use cases beyond the original request. We appreciate your input and will keep you updated as development progresses.

  7. Similar to suggested POs, I would like a list of past-due purchase orders with the ability to send automatic inquiries to vendors regarding the status of these overdue orders.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Add the ability to print barcodes from the PO or receiving page. Then we don't have to search them individually.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Provide functionality to import PMs directly in the system.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. The system does not allow multiple work orders to be generated against the same PM schedule, which limits planning and scheduling capabilities.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. It would be nice to be able to open a picture that is in with the asset and be able to zoom in on it.

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. Currently the Open Form Portal option leaves lots of vulnerability for hacking or malicious malware to be introduced by uploading attachments. A good feature to ADD would be the ability to add an ON/OFF button to enable the ability to allow attachments to be uploaded or not via the portal. That would give users the ability to choose what works best for their company.

    Right not you have the On/Off function for everything else, so I feel that adding it for attachments should be a simple an easy way to assist with the vulnerability issue.

    Currently at our company we…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Thank you for your suggestion—this idea has merit and aligns with our broader strategy. However, due to other priorities, we are unable to pursue it at this time. We’ll keep it on our radar and revisit it when the timing is right or if we see increased interest from our customer community.

  13. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. Requesters need the ability to single sign on the Request Portal

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. Don't want to have to clear our cache approximately once a week to be able to log in to Eptura asset

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. Requestor Status - Ability to see requestor on the app - including email address and name in addition to the username

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. In the Barcode Client, additional text lines on labels can have different font sizes.

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Thank you for your suggestion—this idea has merit and aligns with our broader strategy. However, due to other priorities, we are unable to pursue it at this time. We’ll keep it on our radar and revisit it when the timing is right or if we see increased interest from our customer community.

  19. I would like to be able to add our labor to requests. As of now you cannot add the time put in to a request that it takes to complete it

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. Add ability to add multiple parts at once. Example: List required columns the same as an inventory view page and fill them in to add batches of inventory.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?