Skip to content
Eptura
Feedback by UserVoice

Eptura Asset

Eptura Asset


Welcome to the Eptura Asset Ideas forum. We love hearing your feedback. If you have suggestions for ways Eptura Asset can better meet your needs, please share them with us. While we may not be able to respond to every suggestion, our product team regularly reviews all submitted ideas.

Start contributing

  1. Search to see if your idea already exists and add your voice by commenting or voting.
  2. If you have an idea that’s not listed yet, submit a new entry.
  3. Select a category to tell us which area your idea addresses.
  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

79 results found

  1. Enhance search bar capability to go beyond workorder number search or keyword. Customers are now accustomed to the mainstream experience of just asking a tool what they are looking for. Sample queries below: Followed up with a secondary question asking if the user would like to visualize this data in a visual form.

    “Show me all assets with more than three breakdowns in the past six months.”
    “Which vendors have the longest average response time to work orders?”
    “What’s the total downtime cost for HVAC systems last quarter?”
    “Which locations are consuming the most maintenance labor hours?”
    “Predict which chillers…

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Great news - your idea has been approved for inclusion in our product roadmap! Please note that the final feature set may evolve as we incorporate additional customer feedback, conduct product and design research, and consider broader use cases beyond the original request. We appreciate your input and will keep you updated as development progresses.

  2. In the legacy versions of Eptura Asset, including Classic, there was a Log Module, which allowed end users to update/edit log entries in a timely manner and in one location. Currently logs can be updated in several areas in Eptura Asset, and logs/meters are stored within the Asset Details. For example, logs/meters can be updated on a Work Order and on an Inspection. However, if Logs/Meters need to be updated, this would need to be done manually in the Asset Details. The Log/Meter Import Tool is wonderful for importing logs in mass; however, many client request the ability to view/manage/update…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. Currently, can add the User and Sites; however, CANNOT add security roles. Extremely time consuming to add security role on all Sites for Enterprise clients. API development requested.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Thank you for your suggestion—this idea has merit and aligns with our broader strategy. However, due to other priorities, we are unable to pursue it at this time. We’ll keep it on our radar and revisit it when the timing is right or if we see increased interest from our customer community.

  4. We should be able to print from the parts screen instead of having to go back to the parts list and finding our part, checking the box, hit the three dots, choose print, pick which printer, hit print. if you sit at the computer all day and have nothing to do then yeah the extra 6 steps are nice. However, some of us think the program should make our lives and workload easier, crazy I know.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Great news - your idea has been approved for inclusion in our product roadmap! Please note that the final feature set may evolve as we incorporate additional customer feedback, conduct product and design research, and consider broader use cases beyond the original request. We appreciate your input and will keep you updated as development progresses.

  5. Integrate the inventory module in the mobile application. This would allow mechanics to consume items from the inventory when on a call so that inventory levels can be tracked more accurately.

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Thank you for your suggestion—this idea has merit and aligns with our broader strategy. However, due to other priorities, we are unable to pursue it at this time. We’ll keep it on our radar and revisit it when the timing is right or if we see increased interest from our customer community.

  6. Add Labor Code API Endpoints. When Enterprise clients add a new user, they currently assign all the applicable Sites and applicable Labor Codes manually. This can be extremely time consuming for clients with 50+ Sites and multiple Labor Codes for each Site.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. The concept is great and going in the right direction.. But, cannot filter by entity/location.
    The node levels are cumbersome to work with, would like this refined for training and general understanding purposes.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Lifetime is the sum of the difference. For example, if I add a truck at 4000 miles. Then drive 700 miles, the Lifetime Meter will be 700, and the Current Mileage will be 4700. This causes confusion for the clients.

    Currently, this encourages clients to add the Asset at 0 miles - even if it's not accurate. Classic has ability to add past dates; however, Lightning does not allow this.

    Clients are being encouraged to ignore the difference (see example above) and when they do a reset for real, they will then match. There is no reason for the lifetime…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Enterprise client requesting. Principal QA Engineer knows the use case. Please update. Thank you.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. In order to improve end-user experience in the Support Hub, add a scale to understand the end user's depth of knowledge/experience, so the support team member knows what type of communication is appropriate. When a client has depth of technical knowledge, they find remedial communication/instruction offensive/frustrating. For example, "what browser are you using", "clear cache and cookies", etc. would be basic steps technicians would have already considered when troubleshooting.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. Currently, Lightning allows clients to mass ASSIGN Work Orders; however, no option to mass UNASSIGN Work Orders.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. The legacy versions of Eptura Asset had an Audit Module. Please add an Audit Module to the current version of Eptura Asset. Enterprise clients need the ability to know who modified a field in Eptura Asset for training purposes, for example.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. The Enterprise Client has 300 Operator licenses. There is currently a Last Login Date column in Employees & Users Setting. However, this field does not populate for Operator licenses. As a manager, it would be extremely helpful to know which Operators are not using the Operator Companion App/not completing their Inspections in order to hold Operators accountable for completing their pre- and post-inspections.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. A large number of Enterprise clients have requested the ability to track labor hours/labor cost on Operators. Currently, labor hours/labor cost can be captured on Technicians on a Work Order, even when completing an Inspection as a Service Task; however, not on an Inspection for Operators using the Operator Companion App.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. When an Operator fails an Inspection, a WO is generated. Once the technician has completed the Work Order, there is no feedback/no notes available to the Operator to understand what was done to the Asset on the completed Work Order.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. When viewing Associated Parts within Asset Details, there may be a long list of parts. Enterprise client requested the ability to sort the parts by Part Types. There is currently no search bar in the Asset Parts.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. Adding the ability to return a part on the same PO was available on our legacy version, Classic. Enterprise client is frustrated with the current process in Lightning. When returning a part, it's on a separate PO. In this client's perspective, it's like purchasing an item at a store, obtaining a receipt, and then trying to returning that item on a completely different receipt that had nothing at all to do with the original transaction.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. Currently, the number of contact fields available in the Vendor Module is inadequate. Legacy versions of Eptura Asset, such as Classic, permitted additional fields. For example, client may have several contacts for the same Vendor. Additionally, there needs to be multiple phone number fields - one field for the Vendor's corporate number and additional fields for the client's cell number. This request is repeated frequently by many clients.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. Currently, the system allows the same Invoice # to be added more than once. Warning required. Client reports a lengthy/time-consuming process to rectify when receiving a part and allowing a duplicate Invoice #.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. Currently, clients can add a threshold to prevent spend over a specific amount per work order. This is a global setting within the WO workflow. However, client is asking for a flag to be raised when an asset has more than x number of reactive work orders created within a specific period of time, potentially indicating a time to replace rather than repair.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
← Previous 1 3 4
  • Don't see your idea?