79 results found
-
Add ability to keep Asset “Active” or "In Service" after Work Order is complete
Currently, when an Asset is put "Down" on a Work Order, the Asset is automatically put "Active" again once the Work Order is in a completion status. This is true in both the desktop application and in the Work Companion App. Please add the option to keep the Asset down, even after completion of the Work Order. Currently, if the Asset is still "Out of Service" even after the WO is completed, the user must go into the Asset manually to put the Asset down again.
1 voteApproved for Product Roadmap ·
AdminRobbie.Brannen@eptura.com
(Senior Product Manager, Eptura)
responded
Great news - your idea has been approved for inclusion in our product roadmap! Please note that the final feature set may evolve as we incorporate additional customer feedback, conduct product and design research, and consider broader use cases beyond the original request. We appreciate your input and will keep you updated as development progresses.
-
Add editable field for “Downtime and Active” to other options such as "In Service and Out of Service"
Regarding Downtime tracking, an Asset is either "Active" or "Down". Please add the ability to update the fields from "Down" and "Active" to "Out of Service" and "In Service", for example. NOTE: Using the word "Active" can be confusing, as it is overused. For example, an Asset can be "Active" or "Inactive", which is a different topic. Thank you.
1 voteApproved for Product Roadmap ·AdminRobbie.Brannen@eptura.com
(Senior Product Manager, Eptura)
responded
Great news - your idea has been approved for inclusion in our product roadmap! Please note that the final feature set may evolve as we incorporate additional customer feedback, conduct product and design research, and consider broader use cases beyond the original request. We appreciate your input and will keep you updated as development progresses.
-
Suggestion to Improve Inventory Part Creation Process
I wanted to share an observation regarding the current process for adding new parts to the inventory.
At the moment, creating a new part takes a considerable amount of time because every detail has to be filled in manually — such as part number, description, type, brand, status, part name, storage location, cost, and then linking the part to an asset. When many parts are similar, this becomes repetitive and time-consuming.
In the previous system (HIPPO CMMS), this process was more efficient. It was possible to copy an existing part and only update the fields that were different — for…
1 voteThank you for your suggestion—this idea has merit and aligns with our broader strategy. However, due to other priorities, we are unable to pursue it at this time. We’ll keep it on our radar and revisit it when the timing is right or if we see increased interest from our customer community.
-
On Mobile App, it is beneficial if you can sort all work orders by Created Date so that you always have the latest ones on top
On Mobile App, it is beneficial if you can sort all work orders by Created Date so that you always have the latest ones on top of the page.
1 voteApproved for Product Roadmap ·AdminRobbie.Brannen@eptura.com
(Senior Product Manager, Eptura)
responded
Great news - your idea has been approved for inclusion in our product roadmap! Please note that the final feature set may evolve as we incorporate additional customer feedback, conduct product and design research, and consider broader use cases beyond the original request. We appreciate your input and will keep you updated as development progresses.
-
Create the ability to add an automatic fee to work orders
I would like to assign an automatic fee to each work order (Ex. shop supplies) and the amount in USD.
1 voteThank you for your suggestion—this idea has merit and aligns with our broader strategy. However, due to other priorities, we are unable to pursue it at this time. We’ll keep it on our radar and revisit it when the timing is right or if we see increased interest from our customer community.
-
Permissions
Please allow more permissions for B- Sub Admin Role Options rather than the all or nothing checkbox 'Restrict to Assigned'.
1 voteThank you for your suggestion—this idea has merit and aligns with our broader strategy. However, due to other priorities, we are unable to pursue it at this time. We’ll keep it on our radar and revisit it when the timing is right or if we see increased interest from our customer community.
-
API specific 'playground'.
API specific 'playground' or 'push/publish' function to verify API functionality/changes.
Because the API has the ability to create data points, there should be safeguards, sandboxes, or playgrounds in place that allow for testing before feature publishing.
1 voteThank you for your suggestion—this idea has merit and aligns with our broader strategy. However, due to other priorities, we are unable to pursue it at this time. We’ll keep it on our radar and revisit it when the timing is right or if we see increased interest from our customer community.
-
Enable PATCH/PUT Methods for Assets API Endpoint
The ManagerPlus API v2 currently supports GET and POST for
/Assets, but returns HTTP 405 for PATCH/PUT methods. This prevents programmatic updates to existing asset records.Use Case:
We need to bulk-update asset fields (descriptions, statuses, etc.) for our 2,400+ asset inventory without manual UI edits.Requested Feature:
Enable PATCH or PUT on/api2/Assets/{assetKey}to allow updating existing assets via API.Expected Behavior:
PATCH /api2/Assets/{assetKey}
{
"Description": "Updated value",
"StatusId": "ACTIVE"
}Would enable automated data quality workflows and reduce manual administrative overhead for maintaining accurate asset records.
1 voteThank you for your suggestion—this idea has merit and aligns with our broader strategy. However, due to other priorities, we are unable to pursue it at this time. We’ll keep it on our radar and revisit it when the timing is right or if we see increased interest from our customer community.
-
API Access to Complete Asset Field Schema
We need the ability to make API calls that retrieve or set any and all fields associated with asset records, including standard fields, custom fields, budget fields, hierarchy fields, and any other asset properties. Currently, the API documentation doesn't clearly expose all available fields or provide comprehensive endpoints for accessing the full asset schema. This would enable:
-Bulk operations on all asset attributes programmatically
-Complete asset records in API responses (not truncated/limited)
-Field discovery without reverse-engineering existing assets
-Integration with external systems that need to read(at least)/write all asset data (including status/state)
1 voteThank you for your suggestion—this idea has merit and aligns with our broader strategy. However, due to other priorities, we are unable to pursue it at this time. We’ll keep it on our radar and revisit it when the timing is right or if we see increased interest from our customer community.
-
Open Portal Vulnerability - Need On/Off button to allow attachments
Currently the Open Form Portal option leaves lots of vulnerability for hacking or malicious malware to be introduced by uploading attachments. A good feature to ADD would be the ability to add an ON/OFF button to enable the ability to allow attachments to be uploaded or not via the portal. That would give users the ability to choose what works best for their company.
Right not you have the On/Off function for everything else, so I feel that adding it for attachments should be a simple an easy way to assist with the vulnerability issue.
Currently at our company we…
1 voteThank you for your suggestion—this idea has merit and aligns with our broader strategy. However, due to other priorities, we are unable to pursue it at this time. We’ll keep it on our radar and revisit it when the timing is right or if we see increased interest from our customer community.
-
Add ability to force completion of a Service Task prior to completion of the Work Order when Parts are not required
Clients need a way to force technicians to perform the Inspection/complete the Service Task(s) before completing the WO. Currently, the client can toggle on "Service Task with parts and labor" requirement on the Work Order Workflow Settings; however, a part is not always required.
In the screenshot below, the technician was able to complete the Work Order without having completed the Inspection.
1 voteApproved for Product Roadmap ·AdminRobbie.Brannen@eptura.com
(Senior Product Manager, Eptura)
responded
Great news - your idea has been approved for inclusion in our product roadmap! Please note that the final feature set may evolve as we incorporate additional customer feedback, conduct product and design research, and consider broader use cases beyond the original request. We appreciate your input and will keep you updated as development progresses.
-
SSO for the Request Portal
Requesters need the ability to single sign on the Request Portal
1 voteApproved for Product Roadmap ·AdminRobbie.Brannen@eptura.com
(Senior Product Manager, Eptura)
responded
Great news - your idea has been approved for inclusion in our product roadmap! Please note that the final feature set may evolve as we incorporate additional customer feedback, conduct product and design research, and consider broader use cases beyond the original request. We appreciate your input and will keep you updated as development progresses.
-
Formula Risk Scoring
Sample use case: Measure how heavily each vehicle is being used relative to how long it's been in service. This way, you can spot an overworked vehicle that will need replacement sooner.
Vehicle: 2023 Ford Transit Van
In service date: 200 days ago
Total Miles Driven: 25,000
Expected Daily Miles: 100Formula: utilization Ratio = (25,000 / (200x100) ) x 100 = 125%
"By calculating the Utilization Ratio, the fleet manager noticed one van was running 125% of expected load - it had double the brake replacements compared to others. They rotated routes, balanced usage, and reduced unplanned maintenance by…
1 voteApproved for Product Roadmap ·AdminRobbie.Brannen@eptura.com
(Senior Product Manager, Eptura)
responded
Great news - your idea has been approved for inclusion in our product roadmap! Please note that the final feature set may evolve as we incorporate additional customer feedback, conduct product and design research, and consider broader use cases beyond the original request. We appreciate your input and will keep you updated as development progresses.
-
API
Warehouse exposed in Invoice API. It is available in the built in BI tool. But as we are exporting the data to our BI tool and ERP; we need the warehouse so we can alleviate inventory values appropriately.
1 voteThank you for your suggestion—this idea has merit and aligns with our broader strategy. However, due to other priorities, we are unable to pursue it at this time. We’ll keep it on our radar and revisit it when the timing is right or if we see increased interest from our customer community.
-
Invoice Posting API
Add posting to Invoice Module API,
Currently only able to GET
1 voteThank you for your suggestion—this idea has merit and aligns with our broader strategy. However, due to other priorities, we are unable to pursue it at this time. We’ll keep it on our radar and revisit it when the timing is right or if we see increased interest from our customer community.
-
tonya.page@flowco-inc.com
When establishing a new warehouse, the "Warehouse Manager" drop down lists the employee ID. It would be helpful to have the employee's name here. Additionally, if we could begin typing to limit the drop down it would speed things up.
1 voteThank you for your suggestion—this idea has merit and aligns with our broader strategy. However, due to other priorities, we are unable to pursue it at this time. We’ll keep it on our radar and revisit it when the timing is right or if we see increased interest from our customer community.
-
Year in Asset API Call
I guess thats the category. Need to be able to pull Year from the api for assets
1 voteThank you for your suggestion—this idea has merit and aligns with our broader strategy. However, due to other priorities, we are unable to pursue it at this time. We’ll keep it on our radar and revisit it when the timing is right or if we see increased interest from our customer community.
-
Adding Active and inactive data in asset "Activity timeline"
It would be nice to See when a Asset has be activated and inactivated on the "Activity timeline" in the Asset View. Easier to show auditors when a Asset has been inactivated. rather then having to print out a report.
1 voteThank you for your suggestion—this idea has merit and aligns with our broader strategy. However, due to other priorities, we are unable to pursue it at this time. We’ll keep it on our radar and revisit it when the timing is right or if we see increased interest from our customer community.
-
Notes and Photos - Requests Module
Having the ability to carry over conversations from the Request module to the Work Order (WO) ensures that the requester, vendor, and user all have access to relevant photos and notes associated with the request. Additionally, all comments remain visible and accessible to all parties involved—requester, vendor, and user—promoting transparency and better communication throughout the process.
1 voteThank you for your suggestion—this idea has merit and aligns with our broader strategy. However, due to other priorities, we are unable to pursue it at this time. We’ll keep it on our radar and revisit it when the timing is right or if we see increased interest from our customer community.
- Don't see your idea?